0.03/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 960 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:19:51 EDT 2022 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.46 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # post_as_ho12 with pid 10982 completed with status 0 0.18/0.47 # Result found by post_as_ho12 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied 0.18/0.47 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-MSSFFFBN 0.18/0.47 # partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh3 with 65s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # sh3 with pid 10990 completed with status 0 0.18/0.47 # Result found by sh3 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied 0.18/0.47 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-MSSFFFBN 0.18/0.47 # partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh3 with 65s (1) cores 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # Proof found! 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Theorem 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_22, type, cK: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_24, type, epred2_0: $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_26, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_27, type, esk3_2: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_28, type, esk4_2: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_29, type, esk5_2: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_30, type, esk6_4: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_31, type, esk7_3: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_32, type, esk8_4: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_33, type, esk9_3: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.48 thf(decl_34, type, esk10_5: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.48 thf(decl_35, type, esk11_5: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.18/0.48 thf(cTHM631A_pme, conjecture, (![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(((cK @ (^[X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X3)|(X2 @ X3)))))=(^[X4:$i]:(((cK @ X1 @ X4)|(cK @ X2 @ X4))))))=>![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:((![X5:$i]:(((X2 @ X5)<=(X1 @ X5)))=>![X5:$i]:(((cK @ X2 @ X5)<=(cK @ X1 @ X5)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM631A_pme)). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o, X12:$i]:(((cK @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((X1 @ Z0)|(X2 @ Z0)))) @ X12)<=>((cK @ X1 @ X12)|(cK @ X2 @ X12))))=>![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:((![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ X5)=>(X2 @ X5)))=>![X5:$i]:(((cK @ X1 @ X5)=>(cK @ X2 @ X5))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM631A_pme])])])])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X13:$i > $o, X14:$i > $o, X15:$i, X18:$i]:((((~(cK @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((X13 @ Z0)|(X14 @ Z0)))) @ X15)|((cK @ X13 @ X15)|(cK @ X14 @ X15)))&((~(cK @ X13 @ X15)|(cK @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((X13 @ Z0)|(X14 @ Z0)))) @ X15))&(~(cK @ X14 @ X15)|(cK @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((X13 @ Z0)|(X14 @ Z0)))) @ X15))))&((~(epred1_0 @ X18)|(epred2_0 @ X18))&((cK @ epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&~(cK @ epred2_0 @ esk1_0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~((cK @ epred2_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((cK @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((X2 @ Z0)|(X1 @ Z0)))) @ X3)|~((cK @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:((((^[Z0:$i]:(((X1 @ Z0)|(X2 @ Z0))))!=(epred2_0))|~((cK @ X2 @ esk1_0)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(((((X1 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X2))|(X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X2)))<~>(epred2_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X2)))|~((cK @ X2 @ esk1_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(((epred2_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X2))|(X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X2))|(X1 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X2))|~((cK @ X2 @ esk1_0)))), inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (cK @ epred1_0 @ esk1_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ X3)|~((epred1_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o]:(((epred2_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ epred1_0))|(X1 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ epred1_0)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_9])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:((~((epred2_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X2)))|~((X1 @ (esk3_2 @ X1 @ X2)))|~((cK @ X2 @ esk1_0)))), inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0 @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_0 @ epred1_0)), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.18/0.48 thf(c_0_13, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_12]), c_0_8])]), ['proof']). 0.18/0.48 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.18/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 2 0.18/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses : 7 0.18/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6 0.18/0.48 # Processed clauses : 35 0.18/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.18/0.48 # ...subsumed : 1 0.18/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 34 0.18/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5 0.18/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.18/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.18/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.18/0.48 # Generated clauses : 54 0.18/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 43 0.18/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.18/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2 0.18/0.48 # Paramodulations : 19 0.18/0.48 # Factorizations : 2 0.18/0.48 # NegExts : 10 0.18/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 9 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.18/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.18/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 25 0.18/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3 0.18/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.18/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 19 0.18/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19 0.18/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 63 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 9 0.18/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46 0.18/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3 0.18/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.18/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.18/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.18/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0 0.18/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2419 0.18/0.48 0.18/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.006 s 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.009 s 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages 0.18/0.48 0.18/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.006 s 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.006 s 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.012 s 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages 0.18/0.48 EOF